Translating AI news and trends into real implications for talent development leaders.
A very insightful 2-minute read!
Our job is to keep our finger on the pulse of what’s happening with Talent in the Age of AISM.
Here are some little “hits” of what I’ve been reading lately. To read even more and access FREE resources, see TalentintheAgeofAI.com.
Wendy Wiseman
For all the talk about AI skills, here’s an interesting twist.
One of the hottest skills in the age of artificial intelligence may be one of the oldest:
Thinking.
Not prompting.
Not coding.
Not knowing the newest AI application before everyone else.
Thinking.
Boston Consulting Group’s North America chair recently emphasized critical thinking and judgment as central capabilities even as consultants become significantly more technical and AI becomes embedded across client work.
I find that encouraging.
Because perhaps AI isn’t making human thinking obsolete.
Perhaps it’s finally making sloppy thinking impossible to hide.
AI Can Give You an Answer Before You’ve Earned One
That’s part of its magic.
It’s also part of its danger.
Ask a question and receive an articulate response almost immediately.
The temptation is to confuse the quality of the language with the quality of the reasoning.
Those aren’t the same thing.
A beautifully written answer can rest on a bad assumption.
A confident recommendation can miss critical context.
A brilliant-looking strategy can solve the wrong problem.
Which means the employee of the future needs to become very good at saying:
Wait.
Why?
What are we assuming?
What’s missing?
How do we know?
What would change this conclusion?
Those may be among the most valuable prompts of all—and you don’t need to type them into a machine.
You need to ask them of yourself.
AI Fluency Without Critical Thinking Is a Liability
We’ve spent considerable time encouraging employees to become AI fluent.
We should.
Demand for AI skills continues to rise across industries, with particularly strong growth in staffing and employment services.
But AI fluency cannot become shorthand for competence.
Knowing how to generate an answer is not the same as knowing whether the answer is good.
This is where experienced employees may have an unexpected advantage.
They’ve seen things go wrong.
They recognize patterns.
They know which seemingly insignificant detail can derail an entire project.
That knowledge becomes extraordinarily valuable when paired with AI speed.
We Need to Teach Thinking Deliberately
Here’s the challenge for talent development.
Critical thinking is one of those skills organizations claim to value but rarely teach systematically.
Now we may have to.
Teach employees to challenge AI outputs.
Ask them to defend recommendations.
Present competing conclusions.
Identify assumptions.
Find evidence that contradicts the preferred answer.
Explain why they rejected an AI recommendation.
That’s AI training too.
Maybe the best kind.
So What?
For years, we’ve worried that machines would become better thinkers.
I’m more concerned that humans might become lazier ones.
Don’t let AI’s ability to answer questions weaken your people’s ability to question answers.
The future doesn’t just need AI-fluent employees.
It needs people who can think when the machine sounds convincing.
Especially then.
And, if you want to tell me what you think of this “So What,” email me at Wiseman@TalentintheAgeofAI.com.
Join Talent in the Age of AI today • Follow us on LinkedIn